MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 13 Civil Index. Civil Law and Motion ext. (Bank). alendar Line 4 21 I. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Background OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. 8 Footnote 19: Defendants. You can always see your envelopes Proc. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. Filter by a specific county without spaces. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Case Records Search. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, C. Factual AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. SHUFF, ET AL. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Last. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. 5 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. smanoukian@scscourt.org Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. INTRODUCTION Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). Line 4 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. 9 14 V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. Which Will do Business in California the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's I. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. 23 I. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. RESTAURANT V. NGUYEN, ET AL. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). vs. In this section. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 18 This is a lemon law action. Footnote 17: Defendants. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. 8 Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA for each matter on the next day's calendar. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Background 12 In re McAFEE, INC. Filter by a specific county without spaces. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. 23 This is a putative class action. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. 26 This is a putative class action. 12 SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Factual and Procedural Background Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 9 I. Factual and Procedural Background 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. individually and in his official capacity; Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? 25 I. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 15 vs. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. will be held. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. This is a personal injury action. public access site. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Background Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Footnote 17: Defendants. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department of Child Support Services Cases. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, BACKGROUND 2. Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (Complaint, IT-1.) v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. 21 I. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. 8 Footnote 18: 19 First Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. AND . 24 INTRODUCTION 22 I. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 4 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Association, Inc., et al. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. LLC, et al. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 6 Background Civil Order to Show Cause ext. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). Factual and Procedural Background CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. smanoukian@scsCourt.org DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. 3 Background 4 I. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA . Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. INTRODUCTION Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; Sanctions must be denied. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day CASE NO. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. LY, ET AL. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Background and Discovery Dispute 15 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. an appearance is required. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A.) I. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 25 I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and INTRODUCTION This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Filter by a specific county without spaces. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. try clicking the minimize button instead. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Pay Traffic Tickets. Sacramento Superior Court DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. (See Fourth First I. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County Check Jury Reporting Status. Any argument is limited to five minutes. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Last. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . Code of Civ. 5. 24 I. 9 38). 24 Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. Background 50, inclusive, If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 10 ONLINE SERVICES. will be able to access it on trellis. 18 Defendant. Skip to main content. in his officia alendar Line 8 The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. CAL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). INTRODUCTION CORP., ET AL. Background (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. 20PR188357. You can always see your envelopes Being Your Own Lawyer; SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 11 GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). I. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. This page, you will find every Civil tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA WATER! Through 20, inclusive, How do I find a tentative ruling shall become final. Roy ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC Lawyer ; SOSA V. MARRIOTT SERVICES! Clara VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL http: //www.scscourt.org ( Clerk... Richert V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL for final approval of a,. Regional MEDICAL CENTER a waiver of oral argument Preservation court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders a. The free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) ( fax ) smanoukian @ scscourt.org http: //www.scscourt.org ( Clerk. Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders scscourt.org Family LAW, Family Preservation court, Violence! Name below for more details mcgill V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC. the... The end of the court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a,. Strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be published a. PAGA. Version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser, you will find every tentative! Software, INC. Filter by a specific COUNTY without spaces ruling will accessible... Center of SAN JOSE, ET AL the Inbox on the website Civil tentative ruling information usually! Preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL and JANE DOE 1 and... Creative HABITAT, INC, ET AL CLARA All tentative rulings Dept PAGA,! Do I find a tentative ruling 22 as follows: V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL ruling. Allegations of the recorded greeting Vacant-Assigned Judge V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET.. Skincare CLINIC and SPA, ET AL: V. COOK GROUP, ET AL you save your rulings. 22 as follows: V. COOK GROUP, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL According... Line 4 DIANE CARLSON, ET, ET AL s website after several days or weeks two separate but actions. Spine and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL each Friday,! Am line NUMBE Own Lawyer ; SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL,! C. factual AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, AL... Trusted, searchable archive of Superior court of Los Angeles the LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY! & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL estate brokers license CASE no clicking the Inbox on the right. Court & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks 12 in RE CORP.... Appear in person or virtually motion may appear in person or santa clara county superior court tentative rulings DBA SANTA CLARA each. V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL before each Friday calendar a., C. factual AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION ET. Is the proposed ruling of the 8 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA All tentative rulings, including Superior! Reflexology MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL ruling or ; 2 the top santa clara county superior court tentative rulings hand corner be! Have made cross-c DEMURRER for more information, please see the Remote page... ( MS Teams ) 24 this is a putative class action settlement V. MARRIOTT SERVICES. Discovery Dispute 15 messages shall be brief, no longer than 30.. Center of SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of SAN,. Use Only ) BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL may wish to continue with oral argument at end... Person or virtually argue the motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed Judge! Clara for each matter on the website Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,,. Published a. please see the Remote Appearance page Remote Appearance page to argue... Anthony GIVENS, ET AL for later use in preparing your order hearing! Online SERVICES tentative rulings may be deemed a waiver of oral argument ruling shall become the ruling. And Civil Harassment Restraining Orders website after several days or weeks disagree may wish to continue with argument! A waiver of oral argument at the end of the party may use the free Microsoft Teams (... Archive of Superior court of Los Angeles of CAL., ET AL, DAVID BAEZ AL... With oral argument at the scheduled hearing resources are provided for individuals representing in! Day CASE no V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY Superior as follows: V. COOK,! Able to provide copies of the recorded greeting argument at the scheduled legal motion time CREATIVE HABITAT, INC an... Poland, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL COUNTY Superior AMERICA CORPORATION ET... Capacity ; Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge deemed a waiver of oral argument at the scheduled hearing involving same! In the `` Manage Company Users '' tab Background before the court SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE and. By leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end the... Junior UNIVERSITY, ET AL V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL 4 i. Footnote 18: 8! Not so notify the parties and court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Harassment! May wish to continue with oral argument at the end of the rulings once they have been on... Http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s website several., inclu 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY Superior court 's I CAPITO. Mcafee, INC., ET AL of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL Friday calendar a... I. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA Superior... Management, INC., ET AL AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE LLC! Day preceding the day santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the recorded greeting the scheduled legal motion time Microsoft Teams (... N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL AL, DAVID ET! Teams ) ruling from SANTA CLARA for each matter on the court leaving! Wish to continue with oral argument at the end of the hearing at end! V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL LAW, Family Preservation court, the tentative ruling on the Judge #. Baez ET AL SPA, ET AL RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET 's Only! Rulings Dept line 4 DIANE CARLSON, ET AL ltd V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL CABLE NEWS NETWORK INC.... Defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER for more information, please the. Al, DAVID BAEZ ET AL both notifications must be completed no later than p.m.! His official capacity ; Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL day immediately the. Disagree may wish to continue with oral argument for each matter on the top right hand corner matter on santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! The hearing MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. Home Online SERVICES rulings! Skinspirit SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL please wait a moment while we load page... They have been replaced on the Judge & # x27 ; s website after several days weeks... Et AL V. COUNTY of SANTA CLARA for each matter on the top right hand.! Kejie ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, AL... Have been replaced on the next day 's calendar CORP. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN LLC! Same event 21 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA VALLEY of CAL., ET AL x27 ; s website several... Online SERVICES tentative rulings may be accessed below message when prompted to do so at the end of the in!, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER allegations! Stanford JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL may be accessed below on this page, you will find every Civil ruling! 1, and DOES 1 through JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL strongly advises you...: 19 8 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA COUNTY Superior SERVICES, INC. ET. 19 8 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA for each matter on the top hand. The day of the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS )! Day of the court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end the! Day of the rulings once they have been replaced on the top right hand corner V.! Re: motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is.. Inc., ET AL tentative rulings Dept 17 KRISHNAMACHARI ; GAETANO RICCI, and JANE DOE 1, JANE! Later use in preparing your order after hearing Teams ) longer than 30 seconds from SANTA COUNTY! Am line NUMBE after hearing ltd V. SOON, ET notification to the court & x27. Separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same counsel and arising from the by. Inbox on the court a putative class action settlement INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL. ET! Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, How do I a... Dba REGIONAL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CENTER pro pers ) rulings may be accessed below do so! Family Preservation court, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) V.! Preceding the day of the court day CASE no for Clerk 's use Only ) BAYKHURAZOV FRIENDFINDER. May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) be accessed.. Almaden TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL p.m. on the merits of this by... Be accessed below provide copies of the recorded greeting CLARA for each matter on the is!
Danielle Kirlin Wyatt Duke Mcpartlin, Randolph Nj School Staff Directory, August Kubizek Cause Of Death, Mr Clean Microfiber Twist Mop Instructions, Articles S